It's easy to imagine that as AI  matures, it will sweep through entire jobs, instantly rendering human work obsolete. But the reality outlined by Drover & Huang in The Forces That Shape AI's Uneven Progress suggests a far more nuanced — and human‑centered — transformation. Rather than replacing whole roles, AI tends to advance task by task, with some parts of jobs automated quickly, and others remaining firmly human.  

 Key Takeaways 

  • AI transforms work task by task, not entire jobs. Most roles will see a mix of automation and human oversight, rather than full replacement. 
  • Human skills remain irreplaceable. Creativity, judgment, emotional intelligence, and strategic thinking are critical in roles where AI assists but cannot fully automate
  • Cross-functional leadership is essential. Effective AI adoption requires collaboration between technology leaders (CTO/CAIO) and people-focused leaders (CHRO) to manage ethics, culture, training, and workforce readiness.
  • Adaptability and upskilling are key. Professionals who continuously learn and identify where they add unique value will thrive in the AI-driven workplace.

The Three Stages of AI Impact  

According to Drover & Huang, AI-driven automation often evolves through three distinct phases:  

  • Assist: AI takes over repetitive, structured, low‑judgment tasks that humans routinely handle — freeing up time for other work.   
  • Reshape: As confidence and systems mature, AI begins handling more of the core execution — while humans shift toward oversight, interpretation, strategic decisions, creative or ambiguous tasks.   
  • Replace (rarely): Full automation of a task or function — but because of human judgment, trust, regulation, and complexity, this final stage is often unreachable or delayed.   

Many jobs, especially those combining routine tasks with judgment, creativity, or interpersonal skills, will thus transform, with humans and AI working together in new ways.  

Why Some Roles Resist Automation  

Drover & Huang argue that not all tasks are equally automatable. A variety of “friction factors” slow or block AI's progress. These include:  

  • Need for human judgment or assurance. Tasks involving ethical decisions, complex tradeoffs, nuanced interpretation, or high stakes seldom lend themselves to full automation.   
  • Regulatory or compliance constraints. Highly regulated industries (e.g. healthcare, finance, law) often require human oversight or liability management that AI can't easily replicate.   
  • Tolerance for error. Where mistakes can have serious consequences, organizations tend to retain human oversight or intervention rather than fully rely on AI.   
  • Complexity, ambiguity, creativity, relationship or context dependence. Roles involving empathy, strategic thinking, creative problem‑solving, or human relationships tend to remain human‑led even when parts are assisted by AI.   

For many workers and leaders, this means opportunity, not extinction.   

Why People Strategy Matters More Than Ever  

As organizations scramble to adopt AI, a critical question emerges: who inside a company should be responsible for deploying and governing AI?  

The rise of a new role — Chief AI Officer (CAIO) — reflects the growing recognition that AI is not just another technology to plug in, but a transformation that requires strategic leadership. While roles like Chief AI Officer, Chief Technology Officer, or Chief Information Officer typically lead AI strategy, many of the most important implications — workforce readiness, ethics, culture, training, and organizational design — sit squarely within people leadership.  

Given the human‑centered aspects of AI adoption, it is worth asking: should talent and people‑oriented leaders, such as a Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO), play a role equal to CTO or CAIO in shaping AI strategy?  

Close-up of multiple hands stacked together in a team gesture. The photo, taken from below, shows smiling men and women, conveying collaboration, unity, and teamwork.

 Should talent and people‑oriented leaders, such as a Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO), play a role equal to CTO or CAIO in shaping AI strategy?  

What this means for professionals 

For professionals working in strategy, leadership, marketing, HR, creative fields, and any role requiring judgment or nuance, the AI era presents meaningful opportunity: 

  • Lean into human strengths: creativity, emotional intelligence, strategic thinking, and ethical judgment. 
  • Think in tasks, not jobs: identify what can be automated and where your expertise adds irreplaceable value. 
  • Lead organizational change: help your teams adopt AI responsibly, preserve trust, and evolve workflows. Advocate for cross-functional AI governance, where People & Culture leaders collaborate closely with Tech leadership. 
  • Stay adaptable: continuing to learn and upskill will matter more than ever, and Northeastern's executive education programs remain a powerful resource for professionals preparing for what's next. 

About Northeastern University Executive Education: Northeastern's Executive Education programs leverage the university's experiential learning model and industry partnerships to deliver practical, immediately applicable solutions for today's business challenges. Through innovative programming that combines academic rigor with real-world application, Executive Education serves professionals and organizations around the world committed to staying ahead of rapidly evolving business landscapes. 

Looking for customized solutions?

Learn how we can help your organization boost performance, increase engagement, and achieve measurable impact through tailored learning solutions